Grants for Lead in Drinking Water in Schools

Grants for Lead in Drinking Water in Schools

Federal Level:

Foundational:

Legislation:

Infrastructure bill. Title II, subsection B covers reducing lead in drinking water. It establishes a grant program to provide assistance to local educational agencies for the replacement of drinking water fountains manufactured prior to 1988. The funding may be used to replace fountains or applied to the cost of monitoring and reporting lead in schools. The bill appropriates not more than $5,000,000 each year from 2018 to 2022. Under the same subsection, section 1466 focuses on guidance for schools regarding lead, section 1467 appropriates $50,000,000 each year from 2018 to 2022 for school lead service line replacement, and section 22006 increases school remediation program funding from $20,000,000 to $100,000,000.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Grant Money or Reimbursement

  • S 1674 – School Building Improvement Act of 2017:

Provides grants for the repair, renovation, and construction of public elementary schools and secondary school and to establish a school infrastructure bond program. Improvement to the environmental conditions of public elementary school or secondary school sites, includes, but is not limited to the reduction or elimination of lead-contaminated drinking water.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Grant Money or Reimbursement

Arizona:

Foundational:

Legislation:

  • HB 2213 – Lead Screening at Child Care Facilities:

$200,000 is to be appropriated from the state general fund in fiscal year 2018‐2019 to the department of environmental quality for lead screening of drinking water in child care facilities.

Status:

-Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for Lead

  • HB 2352 – Lead Screening at Charter Schools

$100,000 is to be appropriated from the state general fund in fiscal year 2018‐2019 to the department of environmental quality for lead screening of drinking water in charter schools.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for Lead

California:

Foundational:

Legislation:

  • AB 746 – Lead in Universities:

This bill would require a community water system that serves a schoolsite of a local educational agency with a building constructed before January 1, 2010, to test for lead in the potable water system of the schoolsite before January 1, 2019. The bill would require the community water system to report its findings to the schoolsite, as specified, and, if the schoolsite’s lead level exceeds a certain level, to test a water sample from the point at which the schoolsite connects to the community water system’s supply network. The bill would require the local educational agency, if the lead level exceeds the specified level at a schoolsite, to notify the parents and guardians of the pupils who attend the schoolsite or preschool. The bill would require the local educational agency to take immediate steps to make inoperable and shut down from use all fountains and faucets where the excess lead levels may exist and would require the local educational agency to work with the school site to ensure that a potable source of drinking water is provided for students.

Status:

– Signed into law (10/13/17)

Allows for:

– Water testing for Lead

– Grant Money or Reimbursement

  • AB 885 – Lead in Drinking Water

As amended, this bill would require a school, defined to include a public elementary school, a public secondary school, a public preschool located on public school property, and a public day care facility located on public school property, to purchase and install, on or before April 1, 2018, certified water filters at all school faucets, fountains, and other outlets designated for drinking or cooking. The bill would require a school to replace all lead-bearing parts within the school’s water delivery system, where feasible and cost effective, on or before January 1, 2020. The bill would require a school, on or before July 1, 2018, to develop and adopt a plan of action relating to these requirements. The bill would require a community water system, as defined, to test, on or before July 1, 2019, and every year thereafter, for the presence of lead at each water outlet used for drinking or cooking at each school within the boundaries of the community water system.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for Lead

– Grant Money or Reimbursement

Lead piping replacement

Would require a school district that has drinking water sources with drinking water that does not meet the United States Environmental Protection Agency drinking water standards for lead or any other contaminant to close access to those drinking water sources, to provide alternative drinking water sources, as specified, and to notify specified persons if the school district is required to provide those alternative drinking water sources.

Allows for:

– N/A

Colorado:

 

Foundational:

 

Legislation:

Directs the Department of Public Health and Environment to establish a grant program to test for lead in public schools’ drinking water. The department will give the highest priority to the oldest public elementary schools, then the oldest public schools that are not elementary schools, and then all other public schools. The department may also consider ability to pay in administering the program. The department is directed to use its best efforts to complete all testing and analysis by June 30, 2020. The public school must provide at least 10% local matching funds and give the test results to its local public health agency, its supplier of water, its school board, and the department.

Status:

– Signed into law (6/8/17)

Allows for:

 

– Water testing for Lead

– Grant Money or Reimbursement

Connecticut:

Foundational:

Legislation:

Requires local and regional boards of education and regional education service centers to submit water samples to the Department of Public Health to conduct periodic testing of lead contamination in school potable water sources and systems in school buildings.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing

D.C.:

Legislation:

  • LB 29 – Childhood Lead Exposure Prevention Amendment Act of 2017:

Amends multiple Acts thereby requiring public schools, public charter schools, recreation facilities, and child development facilities to locate all drinking water sources, install and maintain filters for reducing lead at all drinking water sources and test all drinking water sources for lead annually.

Status:

– Signed into law (7/31/17)

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

– Water filter

Delaware:

Foundational:

Georgia:

Legislation:

Requires testing of drinking water in public and private schools for lead contamination and provides for remediation plans or alternate sources of drinking water.

Status:

– Passed Senate

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

Hawaii:

Foundational:

Idaho:

Foundational:

Illinois:

Foundational:

Legislation:

  • HB 265 – Chicago Lead Report Card:

Creates the Lead in Schools Reporting Act to require on an annual basis the Department of Public Health, in coordination with local departments of public health serving the City of Chicago, to conduct specified lead testing at public school facilities within the City. The testing results will be transmitted to the State Board of Education. The Department will notify the Board if the detection level meets a level the Department deems unsafe. School reports cards for cities with populations more than 500,000 shall include lead testing results.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

  • SB 550 – School Lead Testing

Among other provisions, this bill amends the Child Care Act of 1969 by requiring the adoption of rules for assessing levels of lead in water in licensed day care centers, day care homes, and group day care homes constructed on or before January 1, 2000. The rules will at a minimum include provisions regarding testing parameters, notification of sampling results, and training requirements for lead exposure and mitigation. The Illinois Plumbing License Law, section 35.5, is amended to require the school district or chief school administrator to test for lead in drinking water in school buildings and provide written notification of the test results.

Status:

– Signed into law (1/11/17)

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

Indiana:

Foundational:

Legislation:

  • SB 322 – Lead Poisoning of Children:

Upon determination that a child has a blood lead level of at least 10 micrograms per deciliter, the cause of the lead poisoning shall be determined and remediated.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– N/A

Iowa:

Foundational:

Kansas:

Foundational:

Kentucky:

Foundational:

Maine:

Foundational:

Legislation:

Schools shall submit water samples to the department for analysis at least once every year. The samples must be analyzed for at least lead and arsenic. Results shall be made public.

Status:

– Passed House

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

– Water testing for other contaminants

Public buildings receiving water from a source other than a public water system shall submit water samples to the department for analysis at least once a year. If the water is found to violated the state primary drinking water regulations, the department shall issue an order prohibiting the use of the water for drinking or culinary purposes, which order must remain in force until the water conforms to the state primary drinking water regulations. The results shall be made public.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

– Water testing for other contaminants

  • SP 20 (LD 40) – Strengthen Requirements for Water Testing for Schools:

Any school that takes water from a source other than a public water systems for drinking or culinary purposes shall submit water samples to the department for analysis at least once during each school year. If the water is found to violate the state primary drinking water regulations, the department shall issue an order prohibiting the use of the water for drinking or culinary purposes by the school, which shall remain in force until the water conforms to the state primary drinking water regulations. The results shall be made public upon request.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

– Water testing for other contaminants

Maryland:

Foundational:

Legislation:

  • HB 270 – School Lead Testing:

Requires the Department of Environment and the Department of Education to adopt regulations requiring periodic testing for lead in each drinking water outlet located in an occupied public or nonpublic school building.

Status:

– Signed into law (5/4/17)

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

Massachusetts:

Legislation:

  • SB 456/HB 2915 – Drinking Water in Schools and Early Childhood Programs:

Public water systems will need to fully replace lead service lines to every school district, charter school, nonpublic school, and early childhood program they serve within three years. Replacement should be paid for by the public water system, regardless of ownership of any portion of the service line. When drinking water test results show elevated lead levels the school will need to follow the outlined steps in the bill, including but not limited to installing and maintaining certified filters at all faucets, fountains, or other drinking water outlets.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

– Water filters

– Lead piping replacement

Michigan:

Foundational:

Legislation:

  • HB 4120 – School Lead Testing & Other Contaminants:

Requires a supplier of water to a public school to collect water samples every three years from school drinking water faucets and have the samples analyzed for lead and all other contaminants for which there is a state drinking water standard.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

– Water testing for other contaminants

  • HB 4372 – Lead & other Contaminants in Colleges and Universities:

At least once every year, a supplier of water that provides water to a college or university shall collect water samples from the college or university at have those samples analyzed for the presence of lead and all other contaminants for which there is a state drinking water standard. The results should be provided to the department and the college or university.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

– Water testing for other contaminants

  • HB 4378 – Lead & other Contaminants in Nonpublic Schools:

At least once every 3 years, a supplier of water that provides water to a nonpublic school shall collect water samples from drinking water faucets at the school and have those samples analyzed for the presence for lead and all other contaminants for which there is a state drinking water standard. The results should be provided to the department and the school.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

– Water testing for other contaminants

The Board of Managers will be required to have each veterans’ facility under its supervisions be sampled and tested monthly for the presence of lead and all other substances for which there is a state drinking water standard established under the Safe Drinking Water Act to determine whether the water is in compliance with the act.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

– Water testing for other contaminants

Minnesota:

Foundational:

Legislation:

  • HF 1846 – Lead in Public School Buildings:

Requiring drinking water lead-testing in public school buildings serving students K-12. The plan must include a testing schedule that requires testing for the presence of lead in drinking water in all buildings serving school districts and charter school students where there is a source of water that may be consumed by students. The testing must be conducted annually in calendar years 2018 and 2019. The testing must be conducted at least once every five years thereafter.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

Requiring drinking water lead-testing in schools and licensed child care centers.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

Missouri:

Foundational:

Nevada:

Foundational:

New Hampshire:

Foundational:

Legislation:

Establishes a remediation of lead in water and multifamily housing fund and makes an appropriation for the purposes of the fund. Requires testing for lead in drinking water in child care facilities and schools.

Status:

– Passed House and Senate

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

– Grant Money or Reimbursement

New York:

Foundational:

Legislation:

Provides for annual school lead and copper tap water testing and requires the publication of the testing report and abatement.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

– Water testing for other contaminants

  • AB 7148 – Lead Testing in Water to Day Care Facilities:

Everyday care facility shall conduct periodic first-drawn tap testing of potable water systems to monitor for lead contamination.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

North Carolina:

Foundational:

Legislation:

  • HB 825 – Protect NC Children from Lead Exposure:

Each supplier of water shall test drinking water for the presence of lead at drinking water outlets in each school or childcare facility to which the supplier of water provides treated drinking water, except where the school or child care facility is itself the supplier of water and is already subject to monitoring for lead. The suppliers of water shall use the EPA’s 3Ts technical guidance to establish drinking water sampling collection criteria and protocols to satisfy the requirements in the bill.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

North Dakota:

Foundational:

Ohio:

Foundational:

Oklahoma:

Foundational:

Oregon:

Foundational:

Pennsylvania:

Foundational:

Legislation:

Prior to the start of each school year, every school building in a district, including all drinking water, shall be tested for lead levels. Any school building that finds a lead level that is more than the maximum contaminant level will need to immediately implement a plan to ensure no child or adult is exposed to lead contamination and that alternative sources of drinking water are made available. Additionally, the school building will be retested monthly until the lead level tests are below the limit. The testing reports will be reported to the Department of Education and sent to the parents or guardians of the students. The Department of Education and school district will also be required to post the lead level results for each school building on their websites.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

Rhode Island:

Foundational:

Legislation:

  • HB 5907 – Lead Poisoning Prevention Act:

Public water systems shall fully replace lead service lines at every school district, charter school, nonpublic school, and early childhood program they serve within 3 years. This shall be paid by the public water system, regardless of ownership of any portion of the service line. Each school and early childhood program shall undertake annual testing for lead by a certified laboratory. When drinking water test results show elevated lead levels the school will need to follow the outlined steps in the bill, including but not limited to installing and maintaining certified filters at all faucets, fountains, or other drinking water outlets.

Status:

Introduced

Allows for:

  • Water testing for lead
  • Lead piping replacement

South Carolina:

Foundational:

South Dakota:

Foundational:

Tennessee:

Foundational:

Legislation:

Requires principals of schools build before June 19, 1986, to flush fixtures used for drinking water and food preparation for at least 60 seconds before the arrival of children each school day.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– N/A

Texas:

Legislation:

  • HB 335 – Lead Testing in Public Schools:

This is a reintroduction of HB 2395. Public schools will need to conduct annual first-draw tap tests of potable water systems to monitor the amount of lead in the water in occupied school building under the jurisdiction of the school district. The test should be performed by a third-party. If the test shows the lead levels exceed the MCL, the school will need to continue weekly first-draw tap tests until three consecutive weekly tests confirm the water is safe for human consumption. The school will also need to provide the occupants of the building with a safe supply of drinking water.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

  • SB 1580 – Lead in Schools, Senior Living Center, Hospitals, State Agencies & Public Parks:

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality shall create a program under which the commission routinely tests the levels of lead and copper in the water emitted from all drinking water outlets and water lines that serve property owned and operated by the state or a political subdivision of Texas, including: public schools, publicly owned child care facilities, institutions of higher education and public junior colleges, state supported living centers, public hospitals, state agencies, and public parks.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

– Water testing for other contaminants

Each public water system shall fully replace lead service lines in each public school, private school, or child care facility that is served by the public water system. The replacement shall be paid for by the public water system regardless of ownership of any portion of the service line. Each public school, private school, and child care facility shall develop and adopt a plan of action to prevent elevated lead levels in all water used for drinking or cooking. The plan of action must include the installing and maintaining of certified filters at all drinking water outlets in each school or facility building. Each public school, private school, or child care facility shall undertake periodic testing of the drinking water outlets for the presence of lead. It should be conducted by a certified laboratory and performed at least once a year.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

– Water filters

– Lead piping replacements

Vermont:

Foundational:

Virginia:

Foundational:

Legislation:

Each school board will need to develop and implement a plan to test in school buildings potable water from sources, as often as required of the supplying public water system by the VA Department of Health’s Office of Drinking Water. If the results of any test indicate a level of lead at or above 20 parts per billion, the school board must develop a plan for remediation and retest the water at two consecutive six‐month intervals.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

Each local school board shall develop and implement a plan to test and, if necessary, remediate potable water from sources identified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as high priority for testing, including bubbler-style and cooler-style drinking fountains, cafeteria or kitchen taps, classroom combination sinks and drinking fountains, and sinks known to be or visibly used for consumption. The local school board shall give priority in the testing plan to schools whose school building was constructed, in whole or in part, before 1986.

Status:

– Signed into law (3/20/17)

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

Washington:

Foundational:

Legislation:

  • HB 1842 – Lead in Facilities Frequented by Children:

By January 1, 2018 each school and early childhood program shall develop and adopt a plan of action to prevent lead levels in all water used for drinking or cooking. It must include installing and maintaining certified filters at all faucets, fountains, or other outlets designated for drinking or cooking within eighteen months of the effective date.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

– Water filters

By January 1, 2018 each school shall develop and adopt a plan of action to prevent lead levels in all water used for drinking or cooking. It must include installing and maintaining certified filters at all faucets, fountains, or other outlets designated for drinking or cooking within eighteen months of the effective date.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

– Water filters

$1,500,000 of the general fund for the fiscal year of 2018 and $1,500,000 of the general fund for the fiscal year of 2019 as appropriated solely for increased screening, case management, and an electronic data reporting system to identify children who are at the highest risk of having elevated lead in their blood. Also for sampling and testing of drinking water and water fixtures at public schools.

Status:

– Signed into law (6/30/17)

Allows for:

– Water testing

– Grant Money or Reimbursement

West Virginia:

Foundational:

Wisconsin:

Foundational:

Legislation:

  • AB 298 – Lead in Childcare Centers:

This bill requires child care centers and child care providers to test for lead in drinking water and to provide potable water if lead contamination is found in order to obtain, renew, or continue a child care center license or child care provider certification. The bill defines lead contamination to be a concentration of lead that is greater than 0.005 mg/L.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Water testing for lead

  • SB 141 – Revenue Adjustment for Remediation of Lead in Schools:

Creates a revenue limit adjustment for a school district that incurs cost to remediate lead contamination in water used for drinking and food preparation in the school district, including costs to test for the presence of lead in the water, provide potable water, and replace pipes, drinking fountains, and public fixtures.

Status:

– Introduced

Allows for:

– Grant Money or reimbursement

Wyoming:

Foundational:

Canada:

Foundational:

How to Test for Lead in School Drinking Water

How to Test for Lead in School Drinking Water

11
July, 2018

In the wake of the Flint, Michigan water crisis, many of the country’s public school systems have begun testing their own water for lead, either because of new state regulations requiring them to do so, or simply to be proactive. With elevated levels of lead already found in public schools across the country, including Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Maryland, you may be wondering what you can do to test your own school’s water for elevated lead.

Here we’ve covered four ways that you can test your school’s drinking water for lead.
—01

Find a Lab Certified by the Department of Environmental Protection

If a lab is certified by the Department of Environmental Protection, then you know your water will be accurately tested. The Department of Environmental Protection is supervised by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Step 1: Go to this EPA webpage. Choose your state and you will be directed to a list of DEP-certified labs in your state. You can also call the EPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 1-800-426-4791. If you call this number, they can give you a list of DEP-certified labs near you.

Step 2: Get your sample collection kits. Be sure to contact your water supplier first. Some states, such as Maine, have programs in place to give schools a portion of water sample kits for free. By contacting your city’s water department, you can avoid spending extra money on something for which the state has already allocated funds. Ensure you receive the adequate number of kits. You will need to take a sample from every water source that could potentially be used for drinking water. This includes all water fountains, any faucets in classrooms, and any faucets in kitchens used to prepare food.

Step 3: Collect your sample pre-flush. This means take the sample after water has been stagnant in the pipes for at least eight hours. You may need to go into the building on a day that school is closed, or take the sample early in the morning, before school opens. This pre-flush sample will determine if the pipes in the building are made of lead. Some labs will ask for a second sampling. After all of your pre-flush samples are taken, go back to each water source and take a second sample. This sample will reveal if there is any lead in the header pipe. The header pipe is underground, sometimes referred to as the pipe at “street level”. This is the pipe that would connect the school’s plumbing system to the municipal water line. Taking all of these samples might be difficult for only one or two people to execute. It may be worthwhile to make this a class activity or connect with the Environmental Club, if your school has one.

Step 4: Drop off or mail your samples to the lab. If you live in a state that provides free sample kits to schools, these will often come with prepaid postage.

Step 5: Wait for your results. Most labs will send the results by mail, but some will email the results upon request. Because of the large quantity of samples needed to be taken, it will usually take a few weeks for labs to complete the testing. In the state of Illinois, for example, it can take a month or longer.

Step 6: Inform parents of the results. This is especially true if any of the water sources are found to have elevated levels of lead. Parents must be kept in the loop.

Step 7: Shut down any water sources found to have elevated lead levels. If a water source has levels of lead higher than 15 parts per billion, tape up the faucet or drinking water spout so that it is not accessible, and place signage on the fixture, indicating that it is not safe for consumption. If elevated levels are found in bathroom faucets or utility sinks, these are safe to use for hand washing, but place signage so that it is never used for drinking water. Signage should read something like, “Water Safe for Hand Washing Only. Do Not Drink!”

Pros: Peace of Mind You know you can trust the results of a DEP-certified lab. You will receive a full lab analysis reporting exactly what is in your water. It will detail the lead elevation in parts per billion or milligrams per liter.

Cons: Turnaround Time & Inconvenience Both collecting the samples and waiting for the samples to come back from the lab are time-consuming processes. Depending on the size of your school, it could take quite a while to take a sample from every drinking water fountain, classroom faucet and kitchen faucet. It will be even more time-consuming, if you decide to also test bathroom faucets and other fixtures not generally used for drinking water. Once samples are collected, some labs have a mail-in option but many do not. Depending on what state you are in, you could find yourself having to go out of your way to drive to the lab to get the sterile sample containers and then driving back to the lab to drop the samples off. Lab fees can vary and typically range from $12-$80, but as mentioned earlier, some states cover these fees entirely while others provide subsidies. Contact your water supplier or your state’s public works department to find out if you qualify for assistance.

—02

Buy an Instant Home Test Kit

You can buy an instant lead water test kit at the Home Depot Inc., Lowe’s, Ace Hardware, or many other home improvement retailers. Test kits can also be purchased from online retailers, such as Amazon or eBay. There are many different at-home test kits to choose from. First Alert, H2O OK™, Abotex and WaterSafe are just a few of the many brands.

Step 1: Purchase a test kit at a local home improvement store, or order one from an online retailer.

Step 2: Collect the sample, following the same instructions as if you were sending the water away to a lab. Take the sample only after the water has been stagnant in the pipes for at least eight hours. Take samples from every source that has the potential to be used for drinking or cooking.

The second sample, taken after the water has been running for a couple minutes, will test for lead in the building’s header pipe.

Step 3: Place the lead test strip into the water. Many of these kits come with a variety of strips to test for different contaminants, so make sure you are using the strip designated to test for lead.

Step 4: Wait the recommended time frame and then check the strip. Many kits have very short time frames. First Alert will give the consumer results within ten minutes. These tests read “positive” or “negative”. If it reads negative, that doesn’t mean the water is completely lead free. It only means that it doesn’t have more than 15 parts per billion, and therefore any hypothetical lead content is not high enough to register on the test.

Pros: Instant Results and Easy to Use

With an instant test kit, you will have results in your hand in minutes.

The kits are very easy to use. All you have to do is place the test strip into the water sample and wait for results to appear.

Cons: No Lab Report Showing Parts Per Billion

The test kits will only read positive or negative. You won’t receive a detailed lab report, as you would if going through a DEP-certified lab. Subsequently, even if your results come back negative, you have no way to know for certain whether or not lead is present.

—03

Have Your Water Tested by Your Local Water Supplier

Because of recent issues in Flint, Michigan and the increased awareness surrounding public water quality, many states now have programs in place to test school’s water for free. You may not know about these programs until you reach out to your water supplier. For example, in the state of California, schools are eligible to have their water tested for free but they have to submit a written request and their water supplier must perform tests for lead within three months.

Step 1: To find the contact information for your water supplier, visit the website for your local government and look under “Public Works” or “Water and Sewage”.

Step 2: When you contact the water supplier, make sure to tell them you are calling on behalf of a school, and ask if there are any programs in place to assist you with testing your water or if free water testing is something offered to schools in your state.

Pros: Peace of Mind, Free and Convenient

Municipal water suppliers are held to EPA standards. This is the most trustworthy option. If this is an option that your supplier provides, testing will be free. This testing option will not be labor-intensive, as the water supplier will be responsible for the tests.

Cons: Not Always an Option

This is not an option in all states and will therefore depend on where your school is located.

—04

 Finding Grants     and Funding

There are lots of grants and funding options available to assist public schools in testing their water. The Safe Drinking Water Act was amended in 2015 to make even more funds available to communities. There are a few ways to go about finding a grant to assist you with testing your school’s water.

Step 1:

Start your search by checking out this EPA resource; epa.gov/grants. This site has a lot of information about how to go about applying for grants. It also includes several links to assist you in your search. If you get stuck, you can always contact the EPA directly via their website.

Step 2: To search available grants, go to grants.gov/web/grants/home.html. About halfway down the page, select the tab “Search Grants”. Select the “Funding Instrument Type” as “Grants”. Most of the grants available for the testing of school’s water, will be found under the category “Natural Resources,” which can be selected under the box “Category”. Then search using the terms “water” or “water and schools” in the search bar on the left. This will bring up a list of available grants. You then just need to search through these to find one that is applicable to you. It may be necessary to apply additional filters to your search. You can do this by choosing from parameters, listed on the left-hand side of the screen.

Step 3: You can also go directly through your state or local government. As mentioned earlier in this article, you would do this by going to the website of your local government and looking under either “Public Works” or “Water and Sewage”. Find the contact information for the department to send them an email or give them a call. Ask what grants or assistance are available to help you test your school’s water for lead.

Lead is an anxiety-inducing issue and schools around the country have been finding elevated levels of lead, potentially putting their students at risk. Fortunately there are many resources available to you to help effectively navigate through the situation. One of the resources you have is us here at Because Water. Please feel free to reach out to us with any questions. And for more information on issues relating to water, consider following us on Twitter and Facebook.
Lead in Water in Schools: What You Need to Know

Lead in Water in Schools: What You Need to Know

5

 

July, 2018

In the wake of the crisis in Flint, Michigan, schools across the United States are testing their drinking water. Because of major national gaps in water infrastructure funding and regulations, many are unfortunately finding high lead levels.

They raise the question, “How much lead is there in our schools’ water?”

How severe is the problem of lead in school drinking water?

Lead in school drinking water is a serious issue across the country. Lead levels above US EPA standards have been found in schools from Portland, Oregon to Washington, DC. Already in 2017, news of lead in public school drinking water has come from New York City and throughout Arizona.

It is sadly no surprise that lead contamination is often found in poorer cities and towns, such as Flint, Michigan or Newark, New Jersey. In Newark, about one quarter of school samples contained lead in 2016. Some of those taps have shown lead levels above EPA standards since 2011.

However, that isn’t to say that lead contamination is only limited to poorer areas. Across the state of Massachusetts, a 2016 statewide testing program revealed 164 public schools had elevated lead levels, out of the about 300 tested.

The news in Massachusetts has caused surprise and concern. Glenn Koocher, Executive Director of the Massachusetts Association of School Committees, expressed his alarm. “The presence of lead in any school water supply is distressing. This report should be a call to action.” He recognized the systemic nature of the problem, noting, “The real challenge for us is to prioritize the replacement of lead water pipes as part of our national effort to improve our infrastructure.”

Results to date may only be the tip of the iceberg. Richard Maas, former Co-director of the Environmental Quality Institute at the University of North Carolina-Asheville, estimated that if samples were taken at every school tap in the U.S., 10-20% would test positive for lead. Some schools have even uncovered levels as high as those found in Flint homes. Evidence indicates a pervasive problem, but due to gaps in testing, there’s no way of verifying the problem completely.

What are the health dangers of consuming lead in drinking water?

Lead directly affects children at school by impairing learning and cognition. Lead is correlated with lower standardized test and IQ scores in children. Even after “safe” levels of exposure, its effects are profound.

Lead is a toxin that can affect almost every organ in the body. In children, lead poisoning may negatively impact learning, motor skills, and hormones during crucial years. It can cause developmental delays (for example, delays in speech or puberty), lower IQs, decreased hearing and balance, irritability, loss of appetite, weight loss, sluggishness and fatigue, abdominal pain, vomiting, constipation, seizures, and consumption of items that aren’t food (pica).

Though the EPA only requires action if lead levels in water reach 15 parts per billion, no level of lead is safe to consume. This is especially true for children, whose bodies absorb and accumulate lead more easily than adults.

Lead directly affects children at school by impairing learning and cognition.

Are schools at a higher risk than other places of lead in drinking water?

Most schools are at higher risk for lead in their water than other types of buildings, such as homes (though lead is a problem in many homes as well). There are three reasons for this:

First, most school buildings are decades old and likely to have some lead in their plumbing. In 2013, school buildings in the US were 44 years old on average. By contrast, schools are not considered “lead-free” by today’s standards unless they were built in 2014 or later. Instead, their plumbing materials may contain up to 8% lead.

Second, schools are used primarily in the daytime and during certain times of the year. Water stays in pipes overnight and during several weeks, even months, in the year. As water sits in pipes and plumbing containing lead, lead accumulates in the water, causing high concentrations of lead to materialize.

Third, there is no lead testing rule specific to schools despite their higher risk, so schools may be tested infrequently or sporadically from varying taps.

Lead is particularly dangerous in schools because of the serious effects it can cause for children. Children absorb lead more easily than adults and experience the most severe, long-term effects of lead poisoning.

Aren’t there laws that prevent lead in drinking water?

Yes, but they do not guarantee that there is no lead in school water. The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) requires utilities to test only some taps in each water system, which can include schools but doesn’t cite them directly.

There is no federal law specifically requiring testing of drinking water in schools that receive water from public water systems. This means that about 90% of schools may be used as a sampling location (i.e., tap) for a public water system’s lead testing required under SDWA, but there are no federal requirements for more extensive testing. Schools that do have their own water supplies are subject to more thorough regulation and sampling.

States and towns/cities may also establish their own programs for testing drinking water lead levels in schools. Several, including Illinois and New Jersey, have implemented statewide testing since the water crisis in Flint, Michigan. In Seattle, all schools must be tested every three years. School districts, such as Newton Public Schools in Massachusetts, discovered lead as a result of their own testing programs.

Massachusetts is one state that must improve its testing standards. Each public water system must include samples from at least two schools or early education care centers per district in their testing. Depending on system water quality, these samples may be taken as infrequently as every three years. There can be several sampling periods between tests at each school. This has allowed lead to enter schools’ water unnoticed, as evidenced by the state’s 2016 testing assistance program.

Who is at highest risk from lead in drinking water?

People with houses built before 1986 are most likely to be exposed to lead in water.
 
Infants and young children are at high risk because they absorb lead more easily than adults. They can experience serious long-term effects.
 
Pregnant women can also experience serious effects of lead. Miscarriages, stillbirths, and premature births are all possible.

What are the steps to test for lead in water? How difficult is it?

There are several options for testing lead content in school drinking water. If you are concerned about the possibility of lead at your school, take action by learning the options for testing. Find more resources on our website at becausewater.org.

How can schools take steps toward safe water if they discover lead?

There are two recommended solutions to remediate lead from schools water.

First is traditional pipe remediation, which actually requires identifying the source of lead, which can come from the service line, internal piping, or fixtures. While this could remove all lead from the water, the process can be extremely expensive and time-consuming.  

A growing alternative for schools is to install a filtration system that will reduce lead to safe levels. Assure that the filter is safe by looking for independent certification by NSF & WQA.

What resources are there for schools concerned about lead in drinking water?

  1. US EPA’s 3T’s for Reducing Lead in Drinking Water: Testing.
  2. EPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline: 1-800-426-4791.
  3. How to Remove Lead from School Drinking Water.

Lead contamination of school drinking water has been a neglected issue across the country. There are some regulations and programs that monitor lead in school water, but these are largely insufficient. Therefore, ultimately each school (and you, reading this article) is responsible for making sure that each school’s drinking water is safe.

Sources

US EPA. “Basic Information About Lead in Drinking Water.”

Mayo Clinic. “Lead Poisoning Symptoms and Causes.”

Pediatrics Journal, October 2005. “Lead Exposure in Children: Prevention, Detection, and Management.”

US EPA. “Drinking Water Requirements for States and Public Water Systems: Lead and Copper Rule.”

US EPA. “Consumer Confidence Reports (CCR).”

US Government Publishing Office, June 1991. “Title 40: Protection of Environment; Part 141: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Subpart 1: Control of Lead and Copper.”

American Water Works Association, 2013. “Buried No Longer: Confronting America’s Water Infrastructure Challenge.”

Huffington Post, June 2016. “Portland, Oregon Has A Lead Problem. Kids Are Paying The Price.”

Washington City Paper, June 2016. “D.C. Tested Public Schools’ Water for Lead. More Than 60 Had High Levels.”

The New York Times, March 2016. “High Lead Levels Found at More Newark Schools.”

The New York Times, April 2016. “Drinking Water in Newark Schools Known to Have Lead Problem at Least 6 Years Ago.”

Snell & Wilmer Law, February 2017. “Arizona Tests for Lead in School Drinking Water Reveal Elevated Levels.”

Boston Globe, June 2016. “High Lead Levels Found More Than 160 School Buildings in Mass.”

The Washington Post, March 2004. “EPA Asks for States’ Plans on Lead.”

The Guardian, March 2016. “Alarm over lead found in drinking water at US schools.”

Environmental Health Perspectives, August 2007. “The Relationship between Early Childhood Blood Lead Levels and Performance on End-of-Grade Tests”

WebMD, 2001. “‘Acceptable’ Lead Levels Linked to Lower IQ Scores in Kids.”

WHO, September 2016. “Lead Poisoning and Health.”

National Center for Education Statistics, 2014. “Condition of America’s Public School Facilities: 2012 –13.”

New York State Department of Health, November 2016. “FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS For School Buildings and Grounds Personnel Lead in NYS School Drinking Water.”

State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, July 2016. “New Jersey Technical Guidance: Lead in Drinking Water at Schools & Child Care Facilities.”

The Washington Post, July 2016. “Schools Around the Country Find Lead in Water, With No Easy Answers.”

US EPA, July 2004. “Controlling Lead in Drinking Water for Schools and Day Care Facilities: A Summary of State Programs”

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, March 2016. “The Lead Contamination Control Act (LCCA) Frequently Asked Questions.”